As
the presidential campaign of 2012 heads toward the finish line, Journalist Jane Mayer, of the New Yorker, took a closer look at the issue of voter fraud. Mayer, like other independent
journalists, did not find evidence of widespread voter fraud. What
Mayer did find was “intensely partisan election lawyers and political
operatives, who have spent years stoking fear about election fraud. This
cohort—which Roll Call has called the “voter fraud brain trust”—has
filed lawsuits, released studies, testified before Congress, and written op-ed
columns and books. Since 2011, the effort has spurred legislative initiatives
in thirty-seven states to require photo identification to vote.” Read Mayer’s
full article in The
New Yorker.
Paul Weyrich, Heritage Foundation founder, declaring, "I don't want everybody to vote"
YouTube video
Voter ID advocate Hans Anatol von Spakovsky/Google Images
Republican efforts to suppress the vote, however, date back further than today's Republican Party. In the 1980’s GOP/conservative operative Paul Weyrich (Deceased) flatly declared, before a meeting of evangelical leaders, "I don't want everybody to vote. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down." Weyrich went on to create several conservative think tanks including the American Legislative Exchange Council, which drafted so called “model legislation” on voter ID and is also the founder of the Heritage Foundation, where von Spakovsky is listed as a Senior Legal Fellow.
Supporters of voter ID laws (almost all of whom are Republicans) claim that there is no racial component to the laws they support. But voter ID opponents, civil and voting rights advocates see it differently, Former President Bill Clinton put it this way, “This is not rocket science… the “effort to limit the franchise” was the most determined “since we got rid of the poll tax and all the other Jim Crow burdens on voting.”
Vote by Mail America noted, in our August 23, 2012 post, Re-Segregation, “In 1964 U.S. Senator Strom Thurmond of South Carolina joined the GOP. Since that time there has been an unmistakable trajectory of the Republican Party away from the values and principles of President Lincoln as the party morphed into and came to embody the views and politics of the hateful, racist, segregationist Thurmond... Considering the new demographics of America, that America is no longer a majority caucasian nation and with bi-racial populations ever increasing, it is at once peculiar and confounding that the Republican Party would revert backwards and embrace the failed hateful, divisive politics of Strom Thurmond.”
Vote fraud is virtually non-existent
In August of this year the award winning journalists team of News21 issued the findings of their investigation concerning claims of voter fraud. The Minnesota Post reported the findings this way, “In an exhaustive public records search, News21 reporters sent thousands of requests to elections officers in all 50 states, asking for every case of fraudulent activity, including registration fraud, absentee ballot fraud, vote buying, false election counts, campaign fraud, casting an ineligible vote, voting twice, voter impersonation fraud and intimidation. Analysis of the resulting comprehensive News21 election fraud database turned up 10 cases of voter impersonation. With 146 million registered voters in the United States during that time, those 10 cases represent one out of about every 15 million prospective voters... The analysis shows 491 cases of absentee ballot fraud and 400 cases of registration fraud. A required photo ID at the polls would not have prevented these cases." When the paper asked a nonpartisan elections expert, Public Policy Professor David Schultz of Hamline University's School of Business in St. Paul, about voter fraud Schultz said, "Voter fraud at the polls is an insignificant aspect of American elections." Schultz continued, “There is absolutely no evidence that [voter impersonation fraud] has affected the outcome of any election in the United States, at least any recent election in the United States.”
Where News21 took a purely analytical approach, Jane Mayer’s investigation (also finding little evidence of voter fraud) put names and faces to the long time “alarmist” voter fraud partisans and operatives in the Republican Party.
Jane Mayer was
awarded the 2008 John Chancellor Award for Excellence in Journalism for her
investigative report leading to her book The Dark Side. Mayer is also the recipient of the Ridenhour
Book Prize and the New York Public
Library’s Helen Bernstein Book Award for Excellence in Journalism.
by Brent Scott/ Exe. Dir/Vote by Mail America
I read the articles. But don't expect Republicans let facts stand in the way.
ReplyDeleteMarty
When Hans von Spakovsky was testifying before the Senate Rules and Administration Committee on June 13, 2007, he said, according to his written testimony: ...My father escaped from Russia in the early 1920's after the Communists took control. When my father fled Russia, he settled in Yugoslavia. When World War II ended, he once again had to flee his adopted country when the Communists took control to avoid being arrested and shot."
ReplyDeleteIt makes for a nice story, but a Russian-language biography of Anatol von Spakovsky, as it appeared on the internet site Biografija.ru when I consulted it a few years ago, said that Anatol von Spakovsky, who had been living in the Russian colony in the Yugoslav city of Novi Sad, moved to Germany in 1942, not after World War II.
Why might he have moved to Germany, and why to Huntsville when he came to the U.S.? If you go to http://joeykelly.net/nolugarchives/3270.html, you will find a post from Michael R. Flora, dated 15 July 2003, in which he says: "I met Dr. Georg von Spakovsky when I worked at Marshall Space Flight Center. He was a member of the von Braun team and had met Adolf Hitler."
Maybe some reporter someday should ask Hans von Spakovsky what if any his relationship is to Georg von Spakovsky. Hans's father, Anatol, seems to have been harmless -- he published a volume of awful poetry -- but even if he were shown to have been a Nazi, that can't be held against the son. What can be held against the son, however, are his own despicable actions to disenfranchise voters.